Steinmetz v. Steinmetz

227 P. 715, 67 Cal. App. 798, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 389
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steinmetz v. Steinmetz. Read the opinion of the Court — 67 Cal. App. 195
California Court of Appeal·Decided May 10, 1924·No. Civ. No. 4883.·Published

Opinion

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court of the county of Santa Clara, state of California, dated June 15, 1923, directing the plaintiff to pay to the defendant the sum of $407.80 for attorneys' fees and costs on appeal from an order of said court for alimony, attorneys' fees and costspendente lite made in the above-entitled action on May 14, 1923, which last-mentioned order was also appealed from and has been affirmed this day by this court. (Steinmetz v. Steinmetz,ante, p. 195 [227 P. 713].) [1] The legal question involved in the decision of that appeal is the only one involved here, and for the reasons *Page 799 stated in said decision and upon the authority thereof the order appealed from is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Nourse, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on July 7, 1924.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steinmetz v. Steinmetz, 227 P. 715, 67 Cal. App. 798, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 389 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924).

227 P. 715 (Steinmetz v. Steinmetz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steinmetz v. Steinmetz
227 P. 713 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)