Steinmetz v. Snead & Co.

12 A.2d 678, 124 N.J.L. 450, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 288
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 25, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.2d 678 (Steinmetz v. Snead & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steinmetz v. Snead & Co., 12 A.2d 678, 124 N.J.L. 450, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 288 (N.J. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court and reported in 123 N. J. L. 497.

For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Case, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 A.2d 678, 124 N.J.L. 450, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinmetz-v-snead-co-nj-1940.