Steinmetz v. Fennessy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Steinmetz v. Fennessy

104 A. 870, 262 Pa. 75, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 590

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 17, 1918

DocketAppeal, No. 366

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A. 870 (Steinmetz v. Fennessy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinmetz v. Fennessy, 104 A. 870, 262 Pa. 75, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 590 (Pa. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from a surcharge by the appellants, school directors of Conyngham Township, Columbia County. The facts found by the court below, upon which the surcharge was based, are not reviewable, for an appeal lies only from legal conclusions in such a case: Sec. 4, Act oí May 3, 1909, P. L. 392. The legal conclusions appealed from logically followed the facts found, and, on those conclusions, the decree of the court below is affirmed, at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from a surcharge by the appellants, school directors of Conyngham Township, Columbia County. The facts found by the court below, upon which the surcharge was based, are not reviewable, for an appeal lies only from legal conclusions in such a case: Sec. 4, Act oí May 3, 1909, P. L. 392. The legal conclusions appealed from logically followed the facts found, and, on those conclusions, the decree of the court below is affirmed, at the costs of the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A. 870, 262 Pa. 75, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinmetz-v-fennessy-pa-1918.