Steinman v. Russell
20 A.D.2d 635, 246 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4491
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 30, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, without costs. In view of the improper remarks made by counsel during summation, although not sufficient to warrant a reversal of the judgment, costs are not awarded to the prevailing party. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steinman v. Russell, 20 A.D.2d 635, 246 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
20 A.D.2d 635 (Steinman v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. United States
499 F.2d 552 (Court of Claims, 1974)