Steinman v. Russell
20 A.D.2d 635, 246 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4491
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 20 A.D.2d 635 (Steinman v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Steinman v. Russell, 20 A.D.2d 635, 246 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
Opinion
Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, without costs. In view of the improper remarks made by counsel during summation, although not sufficient to warrant a reversal of the judgment, costs are not awarded to the prevailing party. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. United States
499 F.2d 552 (Court of Claims, 1974)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 A.D.2d 635, 246 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinman-v-russell-nyappdiv-1964.