Steinman v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Steinman v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

87 N.Y.S. 1149

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 87 N.Y.S. 1149 (Steinman v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinman v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 87 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

A former judgment in favor of plaintiff was reversed, on the ground that upon plaintiff’s own evidence it affirmatively appeared that he had been guilty of contributory negligence. 84 N. Y. Supp. 231. The evidence upon the present trial does not differ in any essential particular from that on the former trial. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCOTT, J.

A former judgment in favor of plaintiff was reversed, on the ground that upon plaintiff’s own evidence it affirmatively appeared that he had been guilty of contributory negligence. 84 N. Y. Supp. 231. The evidence upon the present trial does not differ in any essential particular from that on the former trial. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinman-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack