Steinman v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
87 N.Y.S. 1149
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steinman v. Interurban Street Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 N.Y.S. 231 →
Opinion
A former judgment in favor of plaintiff was reversed, on the ground that upon plaintiff’s own evidence it affirmatively appeared that he had been guilty of contributory negligence. 84 N. Y. Supp. 231. The evidence upon the present trial does not differ in any essential particular from that on the former trial. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steinman v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 87 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
87 N.Y.S. 1149 (Steinman v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steinman v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
84 N.Y.S. 231 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)