Steinman v. 319 West 48th Street Realty Corp.

276 A.D.2d 355, 715 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10639

This text of 276 A.D.2d 355 (Steinman v. 319 West 48th Street Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steinman v. 319 West 48th Street Realty Corp., 276 A.D.2d 355, 715 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered May 7, 1999, which, in an action for conversion, assault and wrongful eviction, granted defendant landlord’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs wrongful eviction claim was properly dismissed in view of the parties’ stipulation settling a prior summary nonpayment proceeding in which plaintiff agreed to vacate the premises in exchange for defendant’s waiver of rent arrears. Plaintiffs claim that his attorney forced him to sign the stipulation, and that the stipulation should therefore be vacated as the product of duress, is unsupported by any evidence of “a wrongful threat * * * precluding the exercise of free will” (Matter of Guttenplan, 222 AD2d 255, 257, lv denied 88 NY2d 812), and therefore without merit. The assault claim, which the complaint bases on an alleged incident that took place almost three years before, was properly dismissed as barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 215 [3]). To the extent that any additional assaults alleged in plaintiffs opposition papers would not be time-barred, plaintiffs bare conclusory assertion thereof is insufficient to raise a bona fide issue of fact as to their occurrence. Plaintiffs conversion claim, based on the loss of travelers’ checks, fails for the same reason. He cannot remember when or where he purchased the checks, and the bank claimed to have issued the checks has represented that it has no record thereof. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Guttenplan
222 A.D.2d 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 A.D.2d 355, 715 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinman-v-319-west-48th-street-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2000.