Steinman, S. v. Blocker, T., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Steinman, S. v. Blocker, T., Aplt.

DecidedMarch 25, 2021

Docket1 EAP 2020

StatusPublished

This text of Steinman, S. v. Blocker, T., Aplt. (Steinman, S. v. Blocker, T., Aplt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinman, S. v. Blocker, T., Aplt., (Pa. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

SETH H. STEINMAN, : No. 1 EAP 2020 : Appellee : Appeal from the order of : Commonwealth Court dated : November 15, 2019 at 255 MD v. : 2018. : : TYREE C. BLOCKER, COMMISSIONER : OF THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE : OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA, : : Appellant :

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: March 25, 2021 AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2021, the order of the Commonwealth Court is

REVERSED. See Commonwealth v. Lacombe, 234 A.3d 602 (Pa. 2020) (holding

Subchapter I of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§9799.51-

9799.75, does not constitute criminal punishment and therefore does not violate

constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws). See also Commonwealth v. Butler,

226 A.3d 972, 993 (Pa. 2020) (court on remand to consider remaining claims not

addressed).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI