Steinle v. New York Life Ins.
81 F. 489, 26 C.C.A. 491, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1876
Opinion
On the conceded facts of this case there was no contract of life insurance perfected, and the judgment of the circuit court must he affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steinle v. New York Life Ins., 81 F. 489, 26 C.C.A. 491, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1876 (5th Cir. 1897).
81 F. 489 (Steinle v. New York Life Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frier v. Federal Crop Ins.
152 F.2d 149 (Fifth Circuit, 1945)
Zayc v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
13 A.2d 34 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Stonsz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
187 A. 403 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.
79 F.2d 48 (Eighth Circuit, 1935)
Beaty v. Southland Life Ins. Co.
28 S.W.2d 895 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Hansen v. Continental Casualty Co.
287 P. 894 (Washington Supreme Court, 1930)
Munhall v. Travelers Insurance
150 A. 645 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Olson v. American Central Life Insurance
216 N.W. 225 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)
Starr v. Mutual Life Insurance
83 P. 116 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)
Cooksey v. Mutual Life Insurance
83 S.W. 317 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)