Steinkritz Amusement Corp. v. Kaplan
232 A.D. 834
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 232 A.D. 834 (Steinkritz Amusement Corp. v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Steinkritz Amusement Corp. v. Kaplan, 232 A.D. 834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, on authority of Brooklyn United Theatre, Inc., v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Machine Operators’ Union of the United States^and Canada (ante, p. 828), decided herewith. Present ■—• Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinkritz-amusement-corp-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1931.