Steinheimer v. McKinnon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Steinheimer v. McKinnon

177 A.D. 903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 177 A.D. 903 (Steinheimer v. McKinnon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinheimer v. McKinnon, 177 A.D. 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The question of contributory negligence, taking into, account the age, intelligence and experience of the infant plaintiff, should have been submitted to the jury. The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Davis and Shearn, JJ. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The question of contributory negligence, taking into, account the age, intelligence and experience of the infant plaintiff, should have been submitted to the jury. The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Davis and Shearn, JJ. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.D. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinheimer-v-mckinnon-nyappdiv-1917.