Steinhart v. Carver

City of New York Municipal Court

Steinhart v. Carver

28 Misc. 794, 59 N.Y.S. 1115

DecidedJuly 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Misc. 794 (Steinhart v. Carver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinhart v. Carver, 28 Misc. 794, 59 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The practice of the appellant’s attorneys in entering judgment and issuing execution on the sixty-dollar claim, [795]*795after the principal had been paid to and retained by them, does not commend itself to the court, and. this view of the case, doubtless, influenced the judge at Special Term in exercising his discretion as to the terms upon which the judgment should be vacated.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: Conlan and Hascall, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The practice of the appellant’s attorneys in entering judgment and issuing execution on the sixty-dollar claim, [795]*795after the principal had been paid to and retained by them, does not commend itself to the court, and. this view of the case, doubtless, influenced the judge at Special Term in exercising his discretion as to the terms upon which the judgment should be vacated.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: Conlan and Hascall, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Misc. 794, 59 N.Y.S. 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinhart-v-carver-nynyccityct-1899.