Steinhardter v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 292
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 3, 1955
DocketNo. 59416; protest 222443-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 292 (Steinhardter v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steinhardter v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 292 (cusc 1955).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), and that 6 cases out of 325 cases of tuna and bonita, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Cust. Ct. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinhardter-v-united-states-cusc-1955.