Steinhardt v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Steinhardt v. United States

92 F. 139, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2646

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1898

DocketNo. 1,945

StatusPublished

This text of 92 F. 139 (Steinhardt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinhardt v. United States, 92 F. 139, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2646 (circtsdny 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

TOWNSEND, District Judge

(orally). The merchandise in question comprises black-headed pins, which were classified for duty under paragraph 108 of the act of 1890, as "manufactures of glass, or of which glass shall be the component material of chief value,” and claimed in the protest of the importers to be dutiable under paragraph 200, as “pins, metallic,” at 30 per cent, ad valorem. An examination of the samples 'and the record herein shows, that the merchandise in question dearly Calls within the principle of the case already considered, namely, Worthington v. U. S. (No. 1,792) 90 Fed. 797, and the decision of the board of appraisers is therefore reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TOWNSEND, District Judge

(orally). The merchandise in question comprises black-headed pins, which were classified for duty under paragraph 108 of the act of 1890, as "manufactures of glass, or of which glass shall be the component material of chief value,” and claimed in the protest of the importers to be dutiable under paragraph 200, as “pins, metallic,” at 30 per cent, ad valorem. An examination of the samples 'and the record herein shows, that the merchandise in question dearly Calls within the principle of the case already considered, namely, Worthington v. U. S. (No. 1,792) 90 Fed. 797, and the decision of the board of appraisers is therefore reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 F. 139, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinhardt-v-united-states-circtsdny-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack