Steinhardt v. Phelps

32 Misc. 730, 66 N.Y.S. 311
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The exclusion of testimony offered by the defendant tending to show the actual value of the animal in question at the time of the sale was prejudicial error requiring a reversal of this judgment. Where the action is for breach of warranty or fraud in the sale of goods, the measure of damages, if there has been no rescission, is the difference between the value of the chattel, if it had corresponded with the warranty, and its actual value.

[731]*731Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed 'and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steinhardt v. Phelps, 32 Misc. 730, 66 N.Y.S. 311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

32 Misc. 730 (Steinhardt v. Phelps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bodger v. Hills
113 N.Y.S. 879 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)