Steinhardt v. Koeppel

Supreme Court of Florida

Steinhardt v. Koeppel

27 So. 2d 340, 158 Fla. 253, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 561

DecidedSeptember 13, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 27 So. 2d 340 (Steinhardt v. Koeppel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinhardt v. Koeppel, 27 So. 2d 340, 158 Fla. 253, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 561 (Fla. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

BUFORD, J.:

A bill of complaint seeking to impress- a lien on: real property was dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff appealed.

The bill alleged that plaintiff was a real estate broker and that for valuable consideration defendants agreed in writing *254 that if they decided to sell the property within three years plaintiff should be their exclusive agent to consummate the sale and that before the expiration of three years from the date of the agreement defendants sold the property for $12,000.00 through another broker and declined to pay plaintiff the commission of 5% on the sale.

There is no basis in the allegations of the bill of complaint for the relief prayed. See Moss v. Sperry et al., 140 Fla. 301, 191 So. 531, 125 A.L.R. 909 (1939); same, 147 Fla. 86, 2 So. (2nd) 123.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

So ordered.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI