Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.

432 N.E.2d 139, 55 N.Y.2d 802, 447 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3324
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 22, 1981·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Motion by plaintiff Steinhardt to amend the remittitur granted, return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of .the United States, viz.: Whether the holding that the plaintiff’s causes of action accrued and the Statutes of Limitations commenced when the employment-related exposure to asbestos particles occurred deprived plaintiff of due process of law.

On the court’s own motion, in Rosenberg et al., return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the holding that the plaintiffs’ causes of action accrued and the Statutes of Limitations commenced when the employment-related exposure to asbestos particles occurred deprived plaintiffs of due process of law. [See 54 NY2d 1008.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp., 432 N.E.2d 139, 55 N.Y.2d 802, 447 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3324 (N.Y. 1981).

432 N.E.2d 139 (Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Gianotti
813 A.2d 280 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2002)
Germantown Central School District v. Clark
294 A.D.2d 93 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Barresi v. State
232 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
657 N.E.2d 1301 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Weissman v. Dow Corning Corp.
892 F. Supp. 510 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Celotex Corp. v. Meehan
523 So. 2d 141 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Piccirelli v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
128 A.D.2d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Seckular v. Celotex
507 A.2d 290 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Fleishman v. Lilly
467 N.E.2d 517 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Johnson v. Eli Lilly and Co.
577 F. Supp. 174 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1983)