Steiner v. The Parman Corp.
This text of Steiner v. The Parman Corp. (Steiner v. The Parman Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE
FREDRICKA A. STEINER,
Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) ) Davidson Circuit No. 94C-2468 FILED ) December 30, 1997 VS. ) ) Cecil W. Crowson THE PARMAN CORPORATION, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) Appeal No. Defendants/Appellees, ) 01A01-9705-CV-00233
ORDER
The plaintiff-appellant has filed a respectful petition to rehear which has been duly
considered and is hereby respectfully denied.
ENTER ________________
___________________________________ HENRY F. TODD PRESIDING JUDGE, MIDDLE SECTION
___________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE
___________________________________ WALTER W. BUSSART, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Steiner v. The Parman Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiner-v-the-parman-corp-tennctapp-1997.