Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Steiner v. State

Steiner v. State

591 So. 2d 1070, 1991 WL 279434
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 1991·No. No. 90-01378·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse defendant’s habitual offender sentence on the basis that the trial court erred by failing to make the supporting findings required by the habitual offender statute. Section 775.084(l)(a) 1-4, Fla.Stat. (1989); Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289, 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Although the issues raised in the special concurrence are wor[1071]*1071thy of thought, we decline to consider those issues at this time.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur. LEHAN, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steiner v. State, 591 So. 2d 1070, 1991 WL 279434 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

591 So. 2d 1070 (Steiner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bamberg v. State
599 So. 2d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
King v. State
597 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)