Steiner v. Priddy

28 Ill. 179
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 28 Ill. 179 (Steiner v. Priddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steiner v. Priddy, 28 Ill. 179 (Ill. 1862).

Opinion

Catón, O. J.

There was no jurisdiction in the justice of the peace in this cause to evict the party. That could only be done by an action of ejectment. One of two things must exist to give jurisdiction in an action of forcible entry and detainer, or forcible detainer. There must be either a forcible entry, or the relation of landlord and tenant must exist. Neither is shown to exist in this case.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Personal Home Mortgage Co. v. Seegrin
275 Ill. App. 419 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1934)
Craft v. Calmeyer
274 Ill. App. 296 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1934)
Fitzgerald v. Quinn
46 N.E. 287 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)
Burns v. Nash
23 Ill. App. 552 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)
Haskins v. Haskins
67 Ill. 446 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1873)
Cook v. Norton
48 Ill. 20 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1868)
Jackson v. Warren
32 Ill. 331 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1863)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Ill. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiner-v-priddy-ill-1862.