Steiner v. Mt. Vernon Fire Ins. Co.
This text of 470 So. 2d 3 (Steiner v. Mt. Vernon Fire Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edward A. STEINER, Appellant,
v.
MT. VERNON FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Edward A. STEINER, Appellant,
v.
REGENT TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company and Illinois Union Insurance Company, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Kenneth E. Apgar of Butler & Apgar, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
Ted R. Manry, III, and H. Vance Smith of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellees Regent Transp. Equipment Co., Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. and Illinois Union Ins. Co.
John N. Jenkins of Marlow, Shofi, Smith, Hennen, Smith & Slother, P.A., Tampa, for appellee Mt. Vernon Fire Ins. Co.
PER CURIAM.
We adopt the rationale of Pledger v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., 432 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), petition for review denied, 446 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1984), insofar as it pertains to section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1981).
Affirmed.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 So. 2d 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiner-v-mt-vernon-fire-ins-co-fladistctapp-1985.