Steiner v. McKee

517 So. 2d 795, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 195, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 78, 1988 WL 1053
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 13, 1988
DocketNos. 4-86-1370, 4-86-1406
StatusPublished

This text of 517 So. 2d 795 (Steiner v. McKee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steiner v. McKee, 517 So. 2d 795, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 195, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 78, 1988 WL 1053 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm because we do not believe it has been demonstrated on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to admit into evidence a document which was relevant to the issues being tried but which was not disclosed in advance of trial, either during discovery or in accord with the pretrial procedures of the court requiring the disclosure of evidence in advance of trial.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 So. 2d 795, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 195, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 78, 1988 WL 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiner-v-mckee-fladistctapp-1988.