Steiner v. Markel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Steiner v. Markel

955 A.2d 1013, 598 Pa. 208, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1433

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 28, 2008

DocketAppeal No. 74 MAL 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 955 A.2d 1013 (Steiner v. Markel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steiner v. Markel, 955 A.2d 1013, 598 Pa. 208, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1433 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

[209]*209 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Was it reversible legal error for the Superior Court to sua sponte raise the issue of whether a complaint contained a particular cause of action when that cause of action was never previously asserted before the trial court or on appeal?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[209]*209 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Was it reversible legal error for the Superior Court to sua sponte raise the issue of whether a complaint contained a particular cause of action when that cause of action was never previously asserted before the trial court or on appeal?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

955 A.2d 1013, 598 Pa. 208, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiner-v-markel-pa-2008.