Steiner v. Lurie

454 A.2d 138, 308 Pa. Super. 295, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6057
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 30, 1982
Docket908
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 454 A.2d 138 (Steiner v. Lurie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steiner v. Lurie, 454 A.2d 138, 308 Pa. Super. 295, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6057 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff has taken this appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant Quaker Storage Co., after the court below granted Quaker Storage’s motion for compulsory nonsuit. Plaintiff filed this appeal directly from the judgment, rather than filing a motion to remove the non-suit. An appeal does not lie from the entry of a judgment of nonsuit, but rather from the refusal to take it off, and this rule applies to actions in both law and equity. Panepinto v. Dummy’s Delightful Saloonery, 304 Pa.Super.Ct. 256, 258, 450 A.2d 668, 669 (1982), rearg. den’d. Accordingly, this appeal must be quashed. Id.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Biddle v. Johnsonbaugh
664 A.2d 159 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Vucelich v. Trustees of the University
481 A.2d 1193 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
454 A.2d 138, 308 Pa. Super. 295, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiner-v-lurie-pasuperct-1982.