Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Steiner v. Ganley Toyota-Mercedes Benz

Steiner v. Ganley Toyota-Mercedes Benz

790 N.E.2d 329, 99 Ohio St. 3d 211
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 2, 2003
DocketNo. 2002-1216
StatusPublished

This text of 790 N.E.2d 329 (Steiner v. Ganley Toyota-Mercedes Benz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steiner v. Ganley Toyota-Mercedes Benz, 790 N.E.2d 329, 99 Ohio St. 3d 211 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Armstrong v. Best Buy Co., Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573, 788 N.E.2d 1088.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.
788 N.E.2d 1088 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 N.E.2d 329, 99 Ohio St. 3d 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiner-v-ganley-toyota-mercedes-benz-ohio-2003.