Steiner v. Fell

1 U.S. 22, 1 Dall. 22
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1776·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Whenever a writ issues fairly, if it is first delivered it shall take preference—The proceedings, on a Habeas Corpus are de novo; on a certiorari, the court proceed on the state returned. Therefore, both writs cannot issue in the same cause; for the court cannot proceed de novo and on the old record too; which upon the idea of returning both writs must be done. In this case, the defendant not having affected delay, but proceeded in the [23]*23usual course, having taken out the first writ, and delivered it as soon as was usual, his writ should take preference; and the Court accordingly order the return to be made on the Habeas Corpus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steiner v. Fell, 1 U.S. 22, 1 Dall. 22 (1776).

1 U.S. 22 (Steiner v. Fell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steiner v. Fell and Others
1 U.S. 22 (Supreme Court, 1776)