Steiner v. Braunstein
This text of 157 Misc. 273 (Steiner v. Braunstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An agreement by an inventor with the licensee of his patent to submit to the licensee any improvements or inventions which affect the patent, does not obligate the inventor to invent or make improvements and no such obligation will be [274]*274implied. (Fraser v. Kent, 194 App. Div. 742.) Such an agreement is not personal and, therefore, is assignable. (Rosenthal Paper Co. v. Nat. Folding Box & Paper Co., 226 N. Y. 313.)
Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as demanded in the complaint.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 Misc. 273, 283 N.Y.S. 198, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiner-v-braunstein-nyappterm-1935.