Steiner v. Arkansas Auto Group LLC

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

TABITHA STEINER PLAINTIFF

No. 4:21-cv-414-DPM

ARKANSAS AUTO GROUP, LLC d/b/a Arkansas Auto Group, Inc. and CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION DEFENDANTS

ORDER The Court appreciates Credit Acceptance Corporation’s pithy response brief. Doc. 23. There is another layer to this onion. The Court did not pay enough attention to the nonsuit. Steiner’s voluntary dismissal of Jacobs Arkansas Auto Group, LLC meant, under Arkansas law, that it was as if (with certain inapplicable exceptions) the case had never been filed against that defendant. Elzea v. Perry, 340 Ark. 588, 591, 12 $.W.3d 213, 215 (2000); M.F.A. Mut. Ins. Co, v. White, 232 Ark. 28, 30, 334 S.W.2d 686, 687 (1960). Therefore, when Steiner later filed the amended complaint, adding Arkansas Auto Group, LLC — even if it is the same entity as Jacobs Arkansas Auto Group, LLC—the right to remove existed. The Court agrees with the reasoning in Chott v. Cal Gas Corp., 746 F.Supp. 1377, 1378 (E.D. Mo. 1990). The motion to remand, Doc. 16, is denied. The Court will now move on to the arbitration issues.

So Ordered.

LM /Z-. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge ‘le Ly herr

-2-