Steiner v. Ainsworth

New York Court of Common Pleas

Steiner v. Ainsworth

53 How. Pr. 31

DecidedNovember 15, 1876

StatusPublished

This text of 53 How. Pr. 31 (Steiner v. Ainsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steiner v. Ainsworth, 53 How. Pr. 31 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

E. F. Bullard, for plaintiff,

contended that the - attorney for the defendant was paid by the ten dollars allowed in the other case. Second. That, as no examination had ever been had in the Steiner case, the service was never performed for which the statute allows the ten dollars, and, therefore, it should not he taxed against the opposite party.

A. Pond, for defendant.

The court, Landon, J., held that the ten dollars was properly allowed in each case, and affirmed the adjustment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E. F. Bullard, for plaintiff,

contended that the - attorney for the defendant was paid by the ten dollars allowed in the other case. Second. That, as no examination had ever been had in the Steiner case, the service was never performed for which the statute allows the ten dollars, and, therefore, it should not he taxed against the opposite party.

A. Pond, for defendant.

The court, Landon, J., held that the ten dollars was properly allowed in each case, and affirmed the adjustment of costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 How. Pr. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiner-v-ainsworth-nyctcompl-1876.