Steiner v. Ainsworth

53 How. Pr. 31

Opinion

E. F. Bullard, for plaintiff,

contended that the - attorney for the defendant was paid by the ten dollars allowed in the other case. Second. That, as no examination had ever been had in the Steiner case, the service was never performed for which the statute allows the ten dollars, and, therefore, it should not he taxed against the opposite party.

A. Pond, for defendant.

The court, Landon, J., held that the ten dollars was properly allowed in each case, and affirmed the adjustment of costs.