Steinberg v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Steinberg v. State

160 So. 3d 950, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5189, 2015 WL 1609950

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 2015

DocketNo. 5D14-3554

StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 3d 950 (Steinberg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinberg v. State, 160 So. 3d 950, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5189, 2015 WL 1609950 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence because Appellant’s claim is an attack on the legality of his conviction rather than the legality of his sentence. See State v. Moten, 698 So.2d 1345, 1346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, C.J., EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence because Appellant’s claim is an attack on the legality of his conviction rather than the legality of his sentence. See State v. Moten, 698 So.2d 1345, 1346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, C.J., EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 3d 950, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5189, 2015 WL 1609950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack