Steinberg v. Rosenthal

City of New York Municipal Court

Steinberg v. Rosenthal

17 Misc. 53, 39 N.Y.S. 1132, 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 877

DecidedMay 15, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Misc. 53 (Steinberg v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinberg v. Rosenthal, 17 Misc. 53, 39 N.Y.S. 1132, 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 877 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from an order allowing plaintiff to sue as a poor person.

. While it is true that the equities may be with the defendant, yet the court having the right-to grant the order, the only question for us to determine is, was there an abuse of judicial discretion?

[54]*54We cannot say that.

Order affirmed, no costs.

Conlan and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Ordered affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI