Steinberg v. Miller
This text of 262 A.D. 921 (Steinberg v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to prosecute appeal on typewritten record and brief granted. Hill, P. J., Heñernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents. Unemployment benefits are paid only on account of total unemployment. Subdivision 10 of section 502 of the Labor Law provides that the unemployment cannot be caused by the incapacity of the employee. Here it is uncontradicted that the claimant was incapacitated by her pregnancy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 921, 29 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-miller-nyappdiv-1941.