Steinberg v. Mayor of Savannah
This text of 99 S.E. 36 (Steinberg v. Mayor of Savannah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
As a general rule, a court of equity has no jurisdiction to enjoin a threatened criminal prosecution. Prosecutions for violations of municipal ordinances which are punishable by fine or imprisonment are quasi criminal in their nature, and come within the general rule. Oases in which equity will enjoin the enforcement of such ordinances come within the exception to the general rule. The present case arose upon a petition to enjoin the enforcement of a penal municipal ordinance, and falls within the general rule. Georgia Ry. &c. Co. v. Oakland City, 129 Ga. 576 (59 S. E. 296); White v. Tifton, 129 Ga. 582 (59 S. E. 299); Rowland v. Commissioners, 133 Ga. 190 (65 S. E. 404); Mayor &c. of Shellman v. Saxon, 134 Ga. 29 (67 S. E. 438, 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 452); Starnes v. Atlanta, 139 Ga. 531 (77 S. E. 381). The court did not err in refusing the injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 S.E. 36, 149 Ga. 69, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-mayor-of-savannah-ga-1919.