Steinberg v. Manhattan Railway Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Steinberg v. Manhattan Railway Co.

14 Jones & S. 216

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided June 18, 1880·Published

Opinion

By the Court.—Curtis, Ch. J.

The defendant appeals from an order, denying Ms application that the guardian ad litem of the plaintiff file security for costs. The Code of Civil Procedure makes the guardian ad litem responsible for costs (§ 469), but it does not require him to file security therefor. If the legislature had intended that an infant plaintiff should be restrained from prosecuting an action until his guardian ad litem filed security for costs, which, in the present application it is claimed should be for $750, it is but reasonable to suppose they would have made some enactment to that effect.

[218] The order appealed from should be affirmed, with hosts.

• Freedman, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.—Curtis, Ch. J.

The defendant appeals from an order, denying Ms application that the guardian ad litem of the plaintiff file security for costs. The Code of Civil Procedure makes the guardian ad litem responsible for costs (§ 469), but it does not require him to file security therefor. If the legislature had intended that an infant plaintiff should be restrained from prosecuting an action until his guardian ad litem filed security for costs, which, in the present application it is claimed should be for $750, it is but reasonable to suppose they would have made some enactment to that effect.

[218] The order appealed from should be affirmed, with hosts.

• Freedman, J., concurred.

Steinberg v. Manhattan Railway Co., 14 Jones & S. 216 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Pincite

14 Jones & S. 216 (Steinberg v. Manhattan Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.