Steinberg v. Manhattan Railway Co.

14 Jones & S. 216
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJune 18, 1880
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Jones & S. 216 (Steinberg v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steinberg v. Manhattan Railway Co., 14 Jones & S. 216 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Opinion

By the Court.—Curtis, Ch. J.

The defendant appeals from an order, denying Ms application that the guardian ad litem of the plaintiff file security for costs. The Code of Civil Procedure makes the guardian ad litem responsible for costs (§ 469), but it does not require him to file security therefor. If the legislature had intended that an infant plaintiff should be restrained from prosecuting an action until his guardian ad litem filed security for costs, which, in the present application it is claimed should be for $750, it is but reasonable to suppose they would have made some enactment to that effect.

[218]*218The order appealed from should be affirmed, with hosts.

• Freedman, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Jones & S. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-manhattan-railway-co-nysuperctnyc-1880.