Steinberg v. Keane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Steinberg v. Keane

305 A.D.2d 786, 757 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5257

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 305 A.D.2d 786 (Steinberg v. Keane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinberg v. Keane, 305 A.D.2d 786, 757 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of making a false statement. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Smith v Goord, 286 AD2d 793 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of making a false statement. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Smith v Goord, 286 AD2d 793 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 786, 757 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-keane-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack