Steinberg v. John Rosenblum, Inc.
284 A.D. 871, 134 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3865
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1954·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. All concur, except Callahan, J., who dissents in memorandum as follows: On this record it is sufficiently clear that Raymond Concrete Pile Company did not undertake to assume the obligation of John Rosenblum, Inc., with respect to claims of injury to adjacent properties and, therefore, summary judgment should be awarded in favor of Raymond Concrete Pile Company. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ. [See post, p. 948.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steinberg v. John Rosenblum, Inc., 284 A.D. 871, 134 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).
284 A.D. 871 (Steinberg v. John Rosenblum, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schulman Investment Co. v. Olin Corp.
477 F. Supp. 623 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Macrose Realty Corp. v. City of New York
49 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Clover Park Garden Apartments v. Bates & Rogers Construction Co.
76 Misc. 2d 1043 (New York Supreme Court, 1974)