Steinberg v. John Rosenblum, Inc.
This text of 284 A.D. 871 (Steinberg v. John Rosenblum, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. All concur, except Callahan, J., who dissents in memorandum as follows: On this record it is sufficiently clear that Raymond Concrete Pile Company did not undertake to assume the obligation of John Rosenblum, Inc., with respect to claims of injury to adjacent properties and, therefore, summary judgment should be awarded in favor of Raymond Concrete Pile Company. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ. [See post, p. 948.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 871, 134 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-john-rosenblum-inc-nyappdiv-1954.