Steinberg v. Illinois Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities
This text of 837 F.2d 763 (Steinberg v. Illinois Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We agree with the district court that “the defendant improperly asserted a set-off, and not a recoupment, in violation of the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362.” In re Klingberg Schools, 68 B.R. 173, 180 (N.D.Ill.1986).
Defendant no longer opposes night care services claim. Therefore, the issues discussed by the district court in the section captioned “Sovereign Immunity,” which begins at 68 B.R. 176 and continues through the bottom of 68 B.R. 177, are now moot. We accordingly do not reach those issues, but otherwise adopt the district court’s opinion. In re Klingberg Schools, 68 B.R. 173 (N.D.Ill.1986).
The district court’s order is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
837 F.2d 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-illinois-department-of-mental-health-developmental-ca7-1988.