Steinberg v. Illinois Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities

837 F.2d 763
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided January 13, 1988·No. No. 86-3100·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the district court that “the defendant improperly asserted a set-off, and not a recoupment, in violation of the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362.” In re Klingberg Schools, 68 B.R. 173, 180 (N.D.Ill.1986).

Defendant no longer opposes night care services claim. Therefore, the issues discussed by the district court in the section captioned “Sovereign Immunity,” which begins at 68 B.R. 176 and continues through the bottom of 68 B.R. 177, are now moot. We accordingly do not reach those issues, but otherwise adopt the district court’s opinion. In re Klingberg Schools, 68 B.R. 173 (N.D.Ill.1986).

The district court’s order is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steinberg v. Illinois Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities, 837 F.2d 763 (7th Cir. 1988).

837 F.2d 763 (Steinberg v. Illinois Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related