Steinberg v. Factor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Steinberg v. Factor

251 A.D. 751, 298 N.Y.S. 406, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7372

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1937·Published

Opinion

Action by plaintiff Bertha Steinberg to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by slipping on the steps of the apartment building in which she lived, and by her husband to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Appeal by the plaintiffs from judgment in their own favor, on the ground of inadequacy. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. The court is of opinion that the verdict was inadequate. Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by plaintiff Bertha Steinberg to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by slipping on the steps of the apartment building in which she lived, and by her husband to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Appeal by the plaintiffs from judgment in their own favor, on the ground of inadequacy. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. The court is of opinion that the verdict was inadequate. Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Steinberg v. Factor, 251 A.D. 751, 298 N.Y.S. 406, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

251 A.D. 751 (Steinberg v. Factor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.