Steinberg v. Dale System, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Steinberg v. Dale System, Inc.

29 A.D.2d 749, 288 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4668

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 749 (Steinberg v. Dale System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinberg v. Dale System, Inc., 29 A.D.2d 749, 288 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Resettled order and judgment (one paper) unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to limit the examination to all the books and records of the respondent covering the period commencing June 1, 1966 and ending December 14, 1966, and to remand the matter to Special Term for resettlement of the judgment to set forth with clarity and preciseness the specific books and records which the respondent shall make available for inspection covering the period from June 15, 1964 to May 31, 1966; and the order and judgment as thus modified is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The petitioners were heretofore afforded an opportunity of inspection of the books and records for the last mentioned period. It is not clear from the record what further inspection the petitioners require in the protection of their proper rights and the order and judgment appealed from fails to identify with reasonable specificity the books and records which the respondent shall produce for such period. Concur —- Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, MeGivern and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Resettled order and judgment (one paper) unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to limit the examination to all the books and records of the respondent covering the period commencing June 1, 1966 and ending December 14, 1966, and to remand the matter to Special Term for resettlement of the judgment to set forth with clarity and preciseness the specific books and records which the respondent shall make available for inspection covering the period from June 15, 1964 to May 31, 1966; and the order and judgment as thus modified is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The petitioners were heretofore afforded an opportunity of inspection of the books and records for the last mentioned period. It is not clear from the record what further inspection the petitioners require in the protection of their proper rights and the order and judgment appealed from fails to identify with reasonable specificity the books and records which the respondent shall produce for such period. Concur —- Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, MeGivern and Rabin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 749, 288 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-dale-system-inc-nyappdiv-1968.