Steinberg v. Charles Sales Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Steinberg v. Charles Sales Corp.

296 So. 2d 601, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7016

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1170

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 296 So. 2d 601 (Steinberg v. Charles Sales Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinberg v. Charles Sales Corp., 296 So. 2d 601, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7016 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were alleged to be the guarantors of the debt of a corporation. They were sued by the appellee and filed affirmative defenses. After the filing of [602]*602affidavits and the deposition of one of the defendants, the trial judge entered a summary final judgment for the plaintiff.

On this appeal the defendants claim that there is a genuine issue of material fact raised by their defense alleging that the instrument sued upon was not intended by the parties to be a personal guarantee by the defendants of the corporation’s debts. We hold that the claimed defense when supported by every reasonable inference is not clearly shown to be without merit. See Chereton v. Armstrong Rubber Company, Fla. 1956, 87 So.2d 579.

We agree that no^ issue appears upon the remaining defense.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI