Steinberg v. Carreras
This text of 77 Misc. 2d 774 (Steinberg v. Carreras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
While the trial court, consistent with the authority of Levine v. Ehrenberg (N. Y. L. J., June 11,1973, p. 18, col. 2 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]) was justified, in the circumstances of this case, in finding for tenants on the counterclaims, nevertheless, there was a lack of adequate proof of the reduced value of the apartments as a result of the landlord’s failure to supply heat (Borchardt v. Parker, 108 N. Y. S. 585 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]; see, also, 1900-51st St. Corp. v. Dennis, 182 Misc. 127 [App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Jackson v. Paterno, 58 Misc. 201 [App. Term, 1st Dept.], affd. 128 App. Div. 474; Levine v. Ehrenberg, supra).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Misc. 2d 774, 357 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1974 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-carreras-nyappterm-1974.