Steinberg v. Adrabi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Steinberg v. Adrabi

493 So. 2d 546, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1929, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9614

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 9, 1986

DocketNo. 86-788

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 493 So. 2d 546 (Steinberg v. Adrabi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinberg v. Adrabi, 493 So. 2d 546, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1929, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Paragraph 7 of the trial court’s Order on Motions for Contempt, which modified the former husband’s existing child support obligations by providing “[t]hat during the period while the minor children are continuously residing with the Respondent/Husband during his summer vacation, the Respondent/Husband shall not be obligated to pay child support for the minor children,” is reversed upon a holding that where, as here, the former husband filed no pleading requesting modification of his obligation to pay child support, the trial court was without power to order such modification. Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So.2d 334 (Fla.1957); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla.3d DCA 1984). In all other respects, the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Paragraph 7 of the trial court’s Order on Motions for Contempt, which modified the former husband’s existing child support obligations by providing “[t]hat during the period while the minor children are continuously residing with the Respondent/Husband during his summer vacation, the Respondent/Husband shall not be obligated to pay child support for the minor children,” is reversed upon a holding that where, as here, the former husband filed no pleading requesting modification of his obligation to pay child support, the trial court was without power to order such modification. Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So.2d 334 (Fla.1957); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla.3d DCA 1984). In all other respects, the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 So. 2d 546, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1929, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinberg-v-adrabi-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack