Steinback v. J. Weill & Bro.

1 White & W. 525
Texas Commission of Appeals·Decided May 22, 1880·No. No. 1608, Op. Book No. 2, p. 116·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 934. Husband and wife; cannot be partners in mercantile business. The law of this state does not recognize commercial partnerships between husband and wife. It is the duty of the courts to repudiate such a relation between man and wife, as the marital relation has become sufficiently complicated already, without adding that of mercantile partnership or anything like it. [Wallace v. Finberg, 46 Tex. 44.]

§ 935. Husband and wife; judgment against tvife. The husband is a necessary party to any judgment ren[526] dered against the wife. [Pas. Dig. 4644, 4646; R. S. 2855-2857; Taylor v. Murphy, 50 Tex. 291.]

May 22, 1880.

§ 93G. Married woman;- liability of, for debt. A married woman who conducts a mercantile business in her own name, or who is a member of a mercantile firm, is not liable for goods sold to her or to the firm to carry on such business. Such a debt is not for necessaries furnished herself or family, and is not incurred for the benefit of her separate property. [Wallace v. Finberg, 46 Tex. 44.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steinback v. J. Weill & Bro., 1 White & W. 525 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1880).

1 White & W. 525 (Steinback v. J. Weill & Bro.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hitt v. Commonwealth
598 S.E.2d 783 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2004)
Davis v. State
474 S.W.2d 466 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Woody v. State
461 S.W.2d 411 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)