Steinbach v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Steinbach v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund

50 A.D.2d 532, 375 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12246

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 532 (Steinbach v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steinbach v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, 50 A.D.2d 532, 375 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 6, 1974, dismissing petitioner-appellant’s proceeding under article 78 CPLR to annul respondent-respondent’s determination in respect of petitioner’s disability status on retirement, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The vote taken by the trustees was not productive of a clear majority of its membership for the relief sought by petitioner, not all [533]*533eligible votes having been cast. As was conceded on argument by the Corporation Counsel, petitioner’s case is not closed and opportunity is available to him to sustain his position by submission of further proof. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Tilzer and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 6, 1974, dismissing petitioner-appellant’s proceeding under article 78 CPLR to annul respondent-respondent’s determination in respect of petitioner’s disability status on retirement, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The vote taken by the trustees was not productive of a clear majority of its membership for the relief sought by petitioner, not all [533]*533eligible votes having been cast. As was conceded on argument by the Corporation Counsel, petitioner’s case is not closed and opportunity is available to him to sustain his position by submission of further proof. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Tilzer and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 532, 375 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinbach-v-board-of-trustees-of-the-police-pension-fund-nyappdiv-1975.