Steinau v. Gorham

67 N.Y.S. 628, 56 A.D. 618
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 21, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 N.Y.S. 628 (Steinau v. Gorham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steinau v. Gorham, 67 N.Y.S. 628, 56 A.D. 618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are satisfied from the record in this case that there was a misapprehension as to the rights of the parties before the court at the time of the trial, and that probable injustice has resulted from such misapprehension. We are of the opinion that this situation can only be completely remedied by a retrial of all the issues involved in the case. The defendants have taken no exception entitling them as a matter of right to a retrial as to their counterclaim, which we might possibly grant as a matter of favor upon their appeal from the order denying the motion for new trial. Our conclusion, therefore, is that, if the defendants will stipulate to agree to a reversal of the whole judgment, the same will be reversed, without costs to either party; if not, the order denying the motion for a new trial will be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzales v. Sharp & Fellows Contracting Co.
153 P.2d 676 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 N.Y.S. 628, 56 A.D. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinau-v-gorham-nyappdiv-1900.