Steinam v. Salomon

159 A.D. 678, 144 N.Y.S. 879, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8216

This text of 159 A.D. 678 (Steinam v. Salomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steinam v. Salomon, 159 A.D. 678, 144 N.Y.S. 879, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Scott, J.:

The complaint in this action is, in the main, identical with that in Isaacs v. Salomon (159 App. Div. 675), decided herewith, and the rulings made in that case are applicable to this. Paragraphs 8 and 9 of the complaint in this action are not contained in the complaint in the other case. They may have some relevancy as showing the relations between the parties immediately before the sale complained of and, therefore, will not be stricken out.

[679]*679The order should be reversed and the motion granted to the extent indicated, without costs to either party.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlw and Clarke, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed and motion granted to extent stated in opinion, without costs. Orders to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isaacs v. Salomon
159 A.D. 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 A.D. 678, 144 N.Y.S. 879, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinam-v-salomon-nyappdiv-1913.