Stein v. Wasserman

261 A.D. 816, 25 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stein v. Wasserman. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 A.D. 265

Opinion

Order,'so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion in all respects granted upon the ground that the demands are verbose, prolix, repetitious and improper, without prejudice to the service of a proper demand. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stein v. Wasserman, 261 A.D. 816, 25 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 816 (Stein v. Wasserman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.