Stein v. Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stein v. Stein

7 A.D.3d 325, 775 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6691

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.3d 325 (Stein v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stein v. Stein, 7 A.D.3d 325, 775 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County [326]*326(Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), entered January 17, 2003, which granted plaintiff pendente relief in a matrimonial action, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 3, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion for a downward modification, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant fails to show either exigent circumstances or a failure by the motion court to properly consider the factors specified in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6), § 237 (a) and § 240 (1-b) (c) and (f). His remedy for any perceived inequities in the award is a prompt trial (see Anonymous v Anonymous, 241 AD2d 353 [1997]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Sullivan and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County [326]*326(Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), entered January 17, 2003, which granted plaintiff pendente relief in a matrimonial action, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 3, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion for a downward modification, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant fails to show either exigent circumstances or a failure by the motion court to properly consider the factors specified in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6), § 237 (a) and § 240 (1-b) (c) and (f). His remedy for any perceived inequities in the award is a prompt trial (see Anonymous v Anonymous, 241 AD2d 353 [1997]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Sullivan and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.3d 325, 775 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stein-v-stein-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack