Stein v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Stein v. State

50 Ind. 21

DecidedMay 15, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Ind. 21 (Stein v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stein v. State, 50 Ind. 21 (Ind. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Pettit, C. J.

This was an indictment for selling liquor [22]*22on Sunday, to be drank in the house where sold. The only ground urged for the reversal of the judgment is the supposed insufficiency of the indictment in not alleging that the defendant had or had not a permit; for which omission it is claimed the motion to quash should have prevailed.

A majority of the court feel clear, and hold, that the indictment is good, and that it was not error to overrule the motion to quash it. Crone v. The State, 49 Ind. 538.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettit, C. J.

This was an indictment for selling liquor [22]*22on Sunday, to be drank in the house where sold. The only ground urged for the reversal of the judgment is the supposed insufficiency of the indictment in not alleging that the defendant had or had not a permit; for which omission it is claimed the motion to quash should have prevailed.

A majority of the court feel clear, and hold, that the indictment is good, and that it was not error to overrule the motion to quash it. Crone v. The State, 49 Ind. 538.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Ind. 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stein-v-state-ind-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack