Stein v. Richman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Stein v. Richman

119 S.E. 669, 31 Ga. App. 21, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 704

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 3, 1923

Docket14673

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 119 S.E. 669 (Stein v. Richman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stein v. Richman, 119 S.E. 669, 31 Ga. App. 21, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 704 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworti-i, J.

Tlie judge did not err either in striking the plea or in thereafter rendering judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eoneur. Lawrence & Abrahams, for plaintiff in error, cited:

5 Ga. App. 279; 17 Ga. App. 631.

Adams & Adams, contra, cited:

Civil Code (1910), §§3559, 3556-7; 145 Ga. 864; 116 Ga. 8; 28 Ga. App. 807; 21 Ga. App. 181, and cit.; 65 Ga. 305; 125 Ga. 43; Jones, Collat. Sec. § 590, p. 712; 79 Am. Dec. 500 (note); 21 R. C. L. 685-6; 92 U. S. 618 (4); 114 Ga. 668; 150 Ga. 281, 286; 23 Ga. App. 630 (2); Civil Code (1910), § 3538; 123 Ga. 272; 111 Ga. 297-8; 11 Ga. App. 632; 141 Ga. 48.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI