Stein v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stein v. New York City Housing Authority

204 A.D.2d 617, 614 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5560

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 617 (Stein v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stein v. New York City Housing Authority, 204 A.D.2d 617, 614 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Cohen Aronin, J.), dated June 30, 1992, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to strike the fourth affirmative defense and denied the defendant’s cross motion, inter alia, to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-h.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant, the New York City Housing Authority, failed to enforce its right to a physical examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h (see, Owens v New York City Hous. Auth., 203 AD2d 441; Ambroziak v County of Erie, 177 AD2d 974, 975). Ritter, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Cohen Aronin, J.), dated June 30, 1992, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to strike the fourth affirmative defense and denied the defendant’s cross motion, inter alia, to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-h.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant, the New York City Housing Authority, failed to enforce its right to a physical examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h (see, Owens v New York City Hous. Auth., 203 AD2d 441; Ambroziak v County of Erie, 177 AD2d 974, 975). Ritter, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 617, 614 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stein-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack